Peter Schiff Declares Bitcoin ‘Anti-Gold’ as Metals Surge
August 11, 2026 — Bitcoin’s recent price slide amid gold and silver rallies proves the cryptocurrency never functioned as “digital gold,” according to prominent critic Peter Schiff, who argues BTC is now trading as gold’s inverse. The Euro Pacific Asset Management CEO highlighted a widening performance gap between the assets as geopolitical tensions and inflation fears drive investors toward traditional safe havens.
Schiff: Bitcoin Falls While Gold, Silver Rally
Want to trade this news? Bitget offers professional charting tools and deep liquidity.
Schiff intensified his long-running criticism of Bitcoin this week, pointing to market data showing the cryptocurrency down 11% year-to-date while gold climbed 9%, silver gained 11%, the Nasdaq rose 13%, and the Russell 2000 advanced 14%. The gap between gold and bitcoin returns has reached approximately 20 percentage points at various points this year, according to Schiff’s calculations.
“Bitcoin is finally the uncorrelated asset you’ve hoped it would be,” Schiff wrote on X. “Even when risk-on and risk-off assets rise, Bitcoin falls.”
The bitcoin critic argues that the divergent performance proves the “digital gold” narrative was never grounded in how the asset actually trades. Gold traded near $4,378 per ounce as of August 10, up roughly 0.8% on the day, while bitcoin slid below $64,000 and remained there.
War-Driven Inflation Boosts Traditional Safe Havens
Schiff attributes gold and silver’s strength directly to geopolitical risk and inflationary pressure. Writing on SchiffGold’s Friday Gold Wrap, he and his team argued that precious metals likely established a near-term bottom even as equity indexes wobbled, citing an active war, rising oil prices, and renewed inflation concerns as key drivers.
Silver has been particularly strong, setting a nominal all-time high of $121.67 in January and remaining near record territory. Schiff maintains that oil-driven inflation, rising Treasury yields following bond selloffs, and shifting public messaging about the ongoing conflict are the primary forces behind metals’ performance—not renewed confidence in fiat currency stability.
Bitcoin, by contrast, continues to underperform every major asset class Schiff tracks, including equities, which he has separately warned could enter a deeper bear market if the conflict extends.
Schiff’s Ongoing Bitcoin Feud Intensifies
This latest criticism follows Schiff’s July argument that bitcoin’s gold correlation “was never real,” citing the cryptocurrency’s failure to rally alongside precious metals during 2025’s surge as evidence. He has also warned that Strategy, the corporate bitcoin treasury company led by Michael Saylor, could face “much greater” losses given its roughly 840,000 BTC position—a warning that has gained weight as Strategy began selling coins at a loss this year.
Bitcoin supporters have pushed back against Schiff’s repeated attacks, arguing that short-term price divergence during a single risk-off period does not resolve the multi-year debate about bitcoin’s role as a store of value. They also note that gold has experienced sharp drawdowns during past crises despite its safe-haven status.
What This Means
The widening performance gap between bitcoin and precious metals could reshape investor perceptions if it persists. Schiff’s latest data points may influence institutional positioning decisions, particularly among funds that allocated to bitcoin based on the “digital gold” thesis.
For traders, the current divergence suggests bitcoin is trading more like a risk asset than a safe haven, meaning geopolitical developments could drive continued volatility. Those holding bitcoin positions may want to monitor gold’s trajectory as a potential indicator of BTC price movement.
The ongoing conflict and inflation pressures that Schiff cites as catalysts for metals’ strength could continue supporting gold and silver while weighing on bitcoin. Whether this pattern represents a temporary divergence or a fundamental shift in how markets classify bitcoin remains an open question, but Schiff’s data provides compelling evidence for the anti-correlation case.
Not financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
—