U.S. Regulators Propose Strict Stablecoin Customer ID Rules Similar to Banks

June 18, 2026 — Multiple U.S. federal agencies including the Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, and the FDIC have issued a proposed rule requiring stablecoin issuers to adopt customer identification standards comparable to traditional banks. The 130-page proposal opens a 60-day public comment period as regulators implement the GENIUS Act, the first major U.S. crypto law, which mandates stablecoin companies comply with Bank Secrecy Act requirements to combat money laundering and illicit finance.

Immediate Details & Direct Quotes

The proposed rule, released Thursday by the Federal Reserve, Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, FDIC, National Credit Union Administration, and FinCEN, establishes specific customer identification program (CIP) requirements for stablecoin issuers. Under the proposal, stablecoin companies must implement “reasonable procedures for verifying the identity of any person seeking to open an account,” maintain records of identifying information including name and address, and check customers against government terrorist watchlists.

“This effort marks the latest step in implementing last year’s Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act,” according to the regulatory announcement. The agencies previously issued a preliminary document seeking comments in September, receiving 450 responses from industry participants and stakeholders.

Not all regulators are fully satisfied with the scope. Fed Governor Michael Barr expressed concern that “the GENIUS Act regulatory framework does not do enough so far to address the risks of illicit finance conducted through secondary market transactions in payment stablecoins.” Barr stated he will “be paying special attention to the proposal’s consideration of whether the ID provisions should be extended to secondary market activity.”

The proposal explicitly asks for public input on this question: “Should any CIP requirement be extended to secondary market activity? If yes, in what circumstances?”

Market Context & Reaction

The stablecoin market has seen explosive growth and increased competition, with both crypto-native firms and traditional financial institutions vying for position. Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC currently dominate the dollar-pegged token space, but traditional firms have increasingly entered the market.

Under the GENIUS Act framework, regulated stablecoin issuers are designated as “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” (PPSIs) and must meet the same anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing standards that apply to banks and brokerages. FinCEN has simultaneously pursued its own related rule to apply GENIUS Act anti-money laundering provisions specifically to stablecoin issuers.

The 60-day comment period represents a “notice of proposed rulemaking” stage, meaning the agencies will review feedback before issuing final joint rules and beginning enforcement. This follows the September preliminary document that generated 450 industry comments.

Background & Historical Context

The GENIUS Act, passed last year, represents the first comprehensive U.S. federal crypto legislation, placing stablecoin regulation squarely within the traditional financial regulatory framework. The law mandates that stablecoin issuers be treated similarly to conventional financial firms regarding customer identification and anti-money laundering compliance.

The proposed rule specifically requires stablecoin issuers to verify the identity of account openers, maintain records of verification information including name and address, and screen customers against government terrorist lists. These standards mirror requirements already in place for banks, credit unions, and broker-dealers under the Bank Secrecy Act.

The regulatory push comes amid widespread experimentation and growth in the stablecoin sector, with traditional financial firms increasingly competing alongside established crypto companies for market share in the dollar-pegged token ecosystem.

What This Means

The proposed rule signals that stablecoin issuers operating in the U.S. will face regulatory scrutiny comparable to traditional banks, potentially raising compliance costs for crypto-native firms while leveling the playing field for traditional financial institutions entering the market.

Industry participants have 60 days to submit comments, with the agencies expected to review feedback before issuing final rules. The comment period specifically asks whether customer identification requirements should extend to secondary market transactions, a question that could significantly impact how stablecoins are traded and used beyond initial issuance.

Stablecoin issuers should prepare for enhanced compliance infrastructure, including customer verification systems and recordkeeping procedures, as the regulatory framework moves toward finalization and enforcement begins under the GENIUS Act framework.

—